The Progressive Catholic Voice
  An independent and grassroots forum for reflection, dialogue, and the
 exchange of ideas within the Catholic community of Minnesota and beyond


Special Issue
In Response to Archbishop Nienstedt's Nov. 15, 2007
Statement on Homosexuality


November 21, 2007

Living Tree: PCV Logo
St. Francis

Dedicated to St. Francis of Assisi, who heard and responded to God’s call to “repair my Church,” and, in so doing, emulated the justice-making and compassion of our brother Jesus.



The Progressive
Catholic Voice

Previous Issues

October 2007

November 2007



The Progressive Catholic Voice

Editorial Team

Michael Bayly (Coordinating Editor)

Mary Beckfeld

Steve Boyle

Susan Kramp

David McCaffrey (Technical Coordinator)

Brian McNeill

Mary Lynn Murphy

Rick Notch

Theresa O'Brien, CSJ

Paula Ruddy



The Progressive Catholic Voice's
Endorsing Organizations
(To Date)

Call to Action Minnesota

Network of Spiritual Progressives
(Minnesota Chapter)


The Office of Justice, Peace, and Integrity of Creation, School Sisters of Notre Dame, Mankato Province


The Catholic Pastoral Committee on Sexual Minorities (CPCSM)


Catholic Rainbow Parents

Dignity Twin Cities

Inclusive Catholics

CORPUS
 

Anthony Signorelli
and Call to Liberty



 

 


Special Updates

12/2/07

The Vigil for Solidarity, scheduled for today, will go on as planned!

We are especially grateful for those who can make the event in spite of the accumulated snow. Please wear warm clothes and drive carefully.

Please note: the vigil's location has moved from the front steps of the Cathedral
to the north side of the Cathedral,
at the corner of Dayton Ave. & John Ireland Blvd./Summit Ave.

_____________________________________________

"Future Archbishop’s Compassion Stops Short When it Comes to Gays"
Nick Coleman's Column in the Star Tribune, November 28, 2007


Do you encourage and support your lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) family members, and friends who accept and express their sexuality?
 
If so, you’re “cooperating in a grave evil,”
according to Archbishop Nienstedt.

 
If you find yourself in disagreement with the archbishop’s views and would like to see the Church’s teaching on homosexuality reformed in light of credible science and the lived experiences of LGBT people and their families,
then you’re invited to a . . .

Vigil for Solidarity
with LGBT Catholics, their families,
friends, and supporters

Sunday, December 2, 2007
2:00 p.m. – 3:00 p.m.
 
Front steps of the Cathedral of St. Paul
St. Paul, MN

We invite you to stand with us as we “promote” Jesus’ message of inclusion, justice, and compassion.

For more information, contact Michael Bayly
of
The Progressive Catholic Voice
Phone: 612-201-4534
Email: progressivecatholicvoice@gmail.com

To download this flyer (.pdf format), please click here.
Then, please make copies of it and distribute it as widely as possible.

Back to Top

_______________________________________________________________


An Open Letter to Archbishop Nienstedt
Concerning His Recent Comments on Homosexuality

November 21, 2007

Dear Archbishop Nienstedt:

Your November 15 column in The Catholic Spirit on homosexuality leaves us grief-stricken and questioning.

We cannot accept your teaching on this matter.

Your first point is that the US bishops are concerned that Catholics might get "confused about what is right and wrong according to the teachings of the Church, prompting them to endorse or even to commit immoral behavior." Because of this concern, homosexuals in partnered relationships may not get awards, honors or be allowed to speak in a Catholic church.

Our question is: Is it Church teaching that right and wrong are determined by the bishops? We believe that moral positions emerge by discernment from the experience of the faithful as a whole in dialogue with scientific and philosophical communities of inquiry. From our study, as well as our experience as homosexual people, as parents of homosexual people, and as staunch supporters of people who are seeking to live a life of goodness and love, we see homosexuality as one of many good ways to develop our human capacities to love as a preparation for receiving the gift of divine life. Please clarify this for us. Do bishops by their elevation have an infusion of knowledge of right and wrong in all areas?

Your second point is that "those who actively encourage or promote homosexual acts or such activity within a homosexual lifestyle formally cooperate in a grave evil and if they do so knowingly and willingly, are guilty of mortal sin. They have broken communion with the church and are prohibited from receiving holy Communion until they have had a conversion of heart, expressed sorrow for their action and received sacramental absolution from a priest."

By the threat of sin, you have divided parents from children, family members and members of loving communities from each other. Many of us are not affected by your words because we firmly believe that homosexual love is, as all love is, of God. But upon others who are still struggling with Roman Catholic Church teaching on this subject, you have placed an intolerable burden.

For all of us the vagueness of the statement renders it absurd. We are sad to see our leadership in such a position. Is it a mortal sin if we support our homosexual family members and friends in loving, partnered relationships? May we have them to dinner? May we worship with them? May we take care of their children when they need us? May we tell them that we love them and are very happy that they are happy?

Are we not to allow lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons who accept and express their sexuality, or their supportive families and friends, to engage in any of the following activities: 1) work for us if we are employers, 2) rent from us as landowners, 3) secure loans from us if we are bankers, 4) take classes from us or attend our schools if we are educators, 5) engage in business with us if we own or operate a business, or 6) utilize public accommodations or public services if our jobs give us responsibilities over the usage of these public services?

To engage with LGBT persons in any of these above ways certainly could be construed as "encouraging" or "promoting" their "homosexual lifestyles"; yet, to refuse LGBT persons access to any of these activities or services would be in direct violation of Minnesota's Human Rights Act, which has protected them from discrimination based upon sexual or affectional orientation since 1993. Such an interpretation of your recent statement would create much confusion and cause extreme stress for the faithful. Please explain to us what your statement says about these areas of possible conflict.

Your third point is that Always Our Children is not "normative" because it did not come from the whole body of US bishops after discussion and vote. However, your brother bishop, Thomas J. Gumbleton, who served with you in Detroit, disagrees with your opinion about the authority behind this document. He informed us that his recollection of the history regarding this document leads him to conclude that it is clearly normative. Gumbleton recalls that due to criticism from conservative bishops such as yourself, the original draft of Always Our Children (1997) was sent to the Vatican's Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, where it was ratified after some changes were made that did not "significantly alter the message of the document." The document was then reissued by the US bishops' Committee on Marriage and Family in its current form in the summer of 1998. Our understanding is that ratification of a document by the Vatican would supersede the authority of a country's conference of bishops. Our search of documents revealed a news story in the July 17, 1998, issue of the National Catholic Reporter that verifies Bishop Gumbleton's recollection of these events.

Also, in light of your concerns about the authority of episopal statements, does this proclamation of yours on mortal sin for all supporters of homosexual people have the affirmative vote of the whole body of US bishops? It is curious that it could be mortal sin in the Archdiocese of St Paul and Minneapolis to support homosexual partners while in other states in the US and other countries it is not.

Your fourth point is about the pastoral care of homosexuals who accept that they have the "disorder" of same-sex attraction (SSA). Given current science on human sexuality, including the official pronouncements from pertinent professional mental health and educational organizations, we cannot accept your definition of homosexuality as disordered or pathological, nor accept that reparative therapy is ethical or effective. Can you show us reputable scientists of human sexuality that support your position and whose peer-reviewed academic publications agree with your assertions? Does not sound theology need to be informed by solid science?

Also, please note that we recently consulted with experts in the Program in Human Sexuality at the University of Minnesota who tell us that the National Association for the Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH), which has been used as a reference for your positions on homosexuality in recent articles in the Catholic Spirit, have no credibility or respectability among legitimate professional associations pertinent to the study and treatment of homosexual persons. These associations include--among many others--the American Medical Association, the American Psychological Association, and the American Psychiatric Association.

We believe that you genuinely want to create a well-ordered Catholic community in the Archdiocese. Yet, must "orderliness" depend on rigid legalism and unquestioning obedience?  Does not the life and example of Jesus demonstrate that such qualities are subordinate to that type of hospitality that invites and includes all: the different, the marginalized, the sinners, the exceptional, all classes, colors, genders, and orientations.  Intrinsic to this “radical hospitality” is a trusting openness and response to the presence and action of God within the Church as People of God and thus the vast and diverse arena of human life and relationships.

Accordingly, instead of top-down teaching, we believe that all of us should be in continual dialogue from our own study and experience about the norms of right-relationship between and among us in all our differences. As Patrick A. Heelan, S.J., has pointed out in an analysis of John Paul II’s encyclical Fides et Ratio, “the process of learning truth is embodied, dialogical, evolutionary, emergent, metaphorical, imaginative, lifelong, and committed to the entanglement of goodness and truth.”

We need a strong and clear leader who will respect our faith experience and grow together with us to create a witnessing community in this complex society. We have hope that you will join us and that we can support you.

Sincerely,

The Editorial Team of The Progressive Catholic Voice:

Michael Bayly
Mary Beckfeld
Steve Boyle
Susan Kramp
David McCaffrey
Brian McNeill
Mary Lynn Murphy
Rick Notch
Theresa O'Brien, CSJ
Paula Ruddy

Back to Top

___________________________________________________

 

Contacting Us

To Subscribe:

If you received this e-newsletter directly from us and wish to continue receiving it, you need to take no further action (you are already on our list of subscribers) .

If you did NOT receive this e-newsletter directly from us (e.g., forwarded by a friend), and wish to continue receiving it, please send us an email at the following email address: progressivecatholicvoice@gmail.com; and be sure to include the word "Subscribe" in the Subject Line of that email.

 

To Unsubscribe:

If you received this e-newsletter directly from us and do NOT wish to continue receiving it, please send us an email at the following email address: progressivecatholicvoice@gmail.com; and be sure to include the word "Unsubscribe" in the Subject Line of that email.

 

To Contact Us with Your Questions, Comments, or Articles for Publication:

Please send an email to progressivecatholicvoice@gmail.com and include your questions or comments, or attach the article you are requesting our editorial board consider for inclusion in a future issue of the e-newsletter.

Back to Top